US Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Administration

Tax Credits Will Continue Through All ACA Exchanges

US Supreme Court building

Posted by Anne Phelps, Deloitte Advisory Principal, US Health Care Regulatory Leader on June 25, 2015.

Download the report
The United States Supreme Court today (June 25, 2015) ruled 6-3 in favor of the Administration to permit federal premium assistance tax credits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to continue to be made available in the 34 states that currently have federally-facilitated Exchanges, in addition to Exchanges established by the states, to help individuals purchase Exchange coverage. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) operates federally-facilitated Exchanges in states that have not established their own Exchanges under the ACA. Of the 7.3 million people who enrolled via ACA Exchanges in the open enrollment period for 2015 in states with federally-facilitated Exchanges, 87% were determined eligible for premium assistance tax credits1.

Basis for the decision

In the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that “the Act’s context and structure compel the conclusion that [Internal Revenue Code] Section 36B allows tax credits for insurance purchased on any Exchanges created under the Act. Those credits are necessary  for the Federal Exchanges to function like their State Exchange counterparts, and to avoid the type of calamitous result that Congress plainly meant to avoid.”

The Supreme Court  based its decision on a reading of the statute and Congressional intent to resolve the underlying issue in the case. Thus, the Supreme Court’s decision is not based on the Administration’s regulatory interpretation of the statute.

Immediate reactions

In comments in the Rose Garden, President Obama said, “After multiple challenges to this law before the Supreme Court, the Affordable Care Act is here to stay.”

Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) said, “ObamaCare is fundamentally broken, increasing health care costs for millions of Americans. Today’s ruling doesn’t change that fact. Republicans will continue to listen to American families and work to protect them from the consequences of ObamaCare. And we will continue our efforts to repeal the law and replace it with patient-centered solutions that meet the needs of seniors, small business owners, and middle-class families.”

The decision in the case marks the second time that the Supreme Court has ruled on a challenge to a major coverage provision of the ACA. The life sciences and health care sectors have been awaiting the Court’s decision with great anticipation given its potential impact on the health care marketplace. The American Hospital Association, America’s Health Insurance Plans, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and other health care industry groups filed briefs with the Supreme Court supporting the Administration’s position.

Background of the case

The plaintiffs in King vs. Burwell are residents of Virginia, one of the 34 states where HHS currently runs a federally-facilitated Exchange. The plaintiffs asserted that they do not wish to purchase coverage under the ACA, and that if premium assistance tax credits were not provided through the federally-facilitated Exchange in Virginia, they would be exempt from the penalty under the ACA’s individual mandate because the cost of coverage would be unaffordable to them under standards created by the ACA.

The plaintiffs challenged a final rule issued by the Department of the Treasury and the IRS on premium assistance tax credits created under the ACA. The plaintiffs argued that the IRS exceeded its authority in the rule by making available premium assistance tax credits through federally-facilitated Exchanges, citing a provision of the statute that says premium assistance tax credits will be available in “an Exchange established by the State.”

1 “March 31, 2015 Effectuated Enrollment Snapshot,” Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, June 2, 2015.

Anne Phelps
Deloitte Advisory Principal
US Health Care Regulatory Leader
Latest conversations from Anne Phelps on Twitter

Daniel Esquibel
Deloitte Advisory Senior Manager
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s